UTJECAJ ODLUKA I NAČELA EUROPSKOG SUDA ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA NA UREĐENJE INSTITUTA POSEBNIH DOKAZNIH RADNJI U UJEDINJENOJ KRALJEVINI S POSEBNIM NAGLASKOM NA PRESRETANJE KOMUNIKACIJA

In the United Kingdom, regulatory mechanism for intercepting communications has undergone substantial changes in last few decades. Until European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) judgment Malone case (1984), which it found a violation right to protection private and family life pursuant Art. 8 Convention Protection Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), Kingdom did not have concise legislative framework governing interception communications. Legislative frameworks subject matter also been changed by standards set practice ECtHR. The implementation ECHR into British legal system imposed higher privacy as guaranteed ECHR, an environment where common law approach that “the police can do whatever they want long is prohibited law” was no longer sustainable. specific feature regulation special evidentiary actions manifested, some actions, through absence judicial control, at least phase issuing extending orders their implementation. Today, area question governed Regulation Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), 2016 (IPA), related Codes Practice, however Criminal Procedure Code, countries with continental tradition. this paper, author analyses preceded enactment 2000, well new be described biggest reform regulation, has, first time UK, incorporated element power interception. context, arises whether recent meet established Consequently, conclusions are presented concerning revised concept matter.